What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20: A Crash Course on Making Your Place in the World

List Price: $22.99

Our Price: $13.57

You Save: $9.42 (41%)


Product Description

Major life transitions such as leaving the protected environment of school or starting a new career can be daunting. It is scary to face a wall of choices, knowing that no one is going to tell us whether or not we are making the right decision. There is no clearly delineated path or recipe for success. Even figuring out how and where to start can be a challenge. That is, until now.

As executive director of the Stanford Technology Ventures Program, Tina Seelig guides her students as they make the difficult transition from the academic environment to the professional world, providing tangible skills and insights that will last a lifetime. Seelig is an entrepreneur, neuroscientist, and popular teacher, and in What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20 she shares with us what she offers her students—provocative stories, inspiring advice, and a big dose of humility and humor.

These pages are filled with fascinating examples, from the classroom to the boardroom, of individuals defying expectations, challenging assumptions, and achieving amazing success. Seelig throws out the old rules and provides a new model for reaching our highest potential. We discover how to have a healthy disregard for the impossible, how to recover from failure, and how most problems are remarkable opportunities in disguise.

What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20 is a much-needed book for everyone looking to make their mark on the world.

Customer Reviews:

  • what i wish i knew when i was 20
    im her father, her reading is a thing in itself. Dont know when shell finish. I just think it is good food for thought, Roy. She shows some interest....more info
  • Stopped reading after the 1st chapter: Scalping as innovative entrepreneurial technique? "Stanford" branding disappoints
    Open letter to Professor Seelig:

    I picked up your book eagerly when it came out, because I'm a Haas Business School student wishing to make a contribution to this world through entrepreneurship. But I stopped after the first 10 pages or so, and made sure to flip through the rest of the chapters to make sure I wasn't missing out on some big message. I was disappointed.

    "What would you do to earn money if all you had was 5 dollars and 2 hours?" Seemingly harmless and interesting experiment, but your example of the "winning" team had me furrowing my brow in disbelief that a Stanford professor would laud this team for rigging restaurant reservations and taking a commission cut as being "innovative" and "creative" thinkers. Are you serious?? Can nobody else see how ridiculous this is?

    Umm....hello? It's called SCALPING. Scalping is not a novel, innovative concept. Anyone can do it and earn $600 in two hours - ethical people just choose not to.

    Innovative: 0. You can find ticket scalpers anywhere, from crowded sold-out railroad stations of third world countries, to rock concerts. These ticket scalpers are often street kids who don't even have a high school education and are just trying to survive to feed themselves. How is this "creative thinking" by privileged Stanford students?

    Unethical: 1. Those unsuspecting people who are outside waiting in line aren't "benefitting" and "happily paying" for a spot, they've been duped out of a spot, and are unfairly waiting in line because these Stanford students took up a fake spot in the first place. That's like creating an anti-virus software company and then creating a virus so that you can make money from your anti-virus software. It's a cruel and meaningless way to make money.

    Contribution to Society: 0. Who likes middlemen whose sole purpose is to take a commission? Haven't we as a society been working to eliminate travel booking agencies and wanting to deal directly? It's a huge annoyance and unfair rig in the system. And it's easy. Anyone can do it, but it's reprehensible, and we simply choose not to because it's wrong.

    After you laud this team for scalping, you go on to describe how they creatively got the females to sell the spots. Umm...hello? Sex trafficking? Need I go on?

    Stanford is supposed to stand for something - a place for big minds and big ideas that will transform and contribute to our society in a positive and benevolent way. Instead, your "two hours and $5" exercise is inadvertently training a cohort of immoral and unethical business leaders, who will make no contribution to society, and will try to eek out selfish advantage at any price. Enron-in-the-training.

    What would you think of Stanford if you were patiently waiting in line at your favorite restaurant with your wife, only to find that a bunch of Stanford business kids had rigged the system by taking away all the spots ahead of time to turn a profit? Sure, scalping can be a business opportunity Stanford students are allowed to take, but they should not, because they're supposed to be better than that. Aren't Stanford students better than that?

    So what should entrepreneurship at Stanford look like? Why don't you train your students to study macroeconomic trends, identify entrepreneurial opportunities in Asia's shifting markets, how to save our failing economy, or analyze big-picture ideas like Warren Buffet does? Why are you training them to employ get-rich-quick tactics that any street kid in the developing world or city ghettos already know, and then complimenting them for "winning" the exercise and boasting about it in a non-contributing book? You forgot one vital component to the exercise: must contribute to society and be of social value.

    Please, Prof. Seelig, let's teach our nation's brightest minds to be big-picture thinkers and effective philanthropists like Warren Buffet, not get-rich-quick people like Guy Kawasaki who for all we know probably made his actual money from his books and audio tapes. By teaching this approach, you're basically saying Kawasaki is qualified to be a Stanford professor too. Aren't you of a better ilk than him?

    By having the "Stanford" label of approval on these methods, you are harming others even more, because college-aged kids all over will think that well, if Stanford approves, it must be ok. It is NOT okay to scalp money and make a living by tricking unsuspecting people into paying you a commissioner's cut.

    I'm 26 years old, and I know these principles without reading your book. It boggles my mind how this book could be touted as innovative and creative. I learned nothing new, and worry for the kids who will take away the wrong message.

    In fairness though, your intentions were probably good, just misguided, and there were a few good tidbits later on in the book - like the "failure resume" - a good practice that teaches humility I hope. Just please do away with the "2 hours, $5" exercise, or at least, modify it to include principles of decency, and teach your students ethics and how to be upstanding moral citizens worthy of Stanford's branding.

    Instead of "Never miss an opportunity to be fabulous"...at another's expense...how about "Never miss an opportunity to do the right thing"? It's a dangerous mix when you encourage intelligent minds toward selfish attainments that disregard the greater good. Intelligence can be used for good or evil, and these intelligent kids need your guidance toward good if they're going to be our world leaders, helping the less fortunate....more info
  • Nothing exciting in this book
    As a student at Stanford, I was required to read this book for a class immediately upon its release. While the book contains many interesting anecdotes, that's all the book really is. There's nothing in the book that you can use to transform your life, career, or business, and thus I give the book only two stars. There are enough books out there that simply tell you what is important, but very few that actually teach you how to implement it. ...more info
  • Where was this book when I was 20?
    At the age of 51, with an 18 year old son getting ready to run off to college for the experience of his life, this book will be my gift to him, to help him open his mind to the potentials he has within him. I was very naive when I went to college and wish I had a book like this to open my eyes to my own possibilities. Thank you Tina....more info


Old Release Old Products