Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness

List Price: $16.00

Our Price: $9.03

You Save: $6.97 (44%)


Product Description

Questions for Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein What do you mean by "nudge" and why do people sometimes need to be nudged?

Thaler and Sunstein: By a nudge we mean anything that influences our choices. A school cafeteria might try to nudge kids toward good diets by putting the healthiest foods at front. We think that it's time for institutions, including government, to become much more user-friendly by enlisting the science of choice to make life easier for people and by gentling nudging them in directions that will make their lives better. What are some of the situations where nudges can make a difference?

Thaler and Sunstein: Well, to name just a few: better investments for everyone, more savings for retirement, less obesity, more charitable giving, a cleaner planet, and an improved educational system. We could easily make people both wealthier and healthier by devising friendlier choice environments, or architectures. Can you describe a nudge that is now being used successfully?

Thaler and Sunstein: One example is the Save More Tomorrow program. Firms offer employees who are not saving very much the option of joining a program in which their saving rates are automatically increased whenever the employee gets a raise. This plan has more than tripled saving rates in some firms, and is now offered by thousands of employers. What is "choice architecture" and how does it affect the average person's daily life?

Thaler and Sunstein: Choice architecture is the context in which you make your choice. Suppose you go into a cafeteria. What do you see first, the salad bar or the burger and fries stand? Where's the chocolate cake? Where's the fruit? These features influence what you will choose to eat, so the person who decides how to display the food is the choice architect of the cafeteria. All of our choices are similarly influenced by choice architects. The architecture includes rules deciding what happens if you do nothing; what's said and what isn't said; what you see and what you don't. Doctors, employers, credit card companies, banks, and even parents are choice architects.

We show that by carefully designing the choice architecture, we can make dramatic improvements in the decisions people make, without forcing anyone to do anything. For example, we can help people save more and invest better in their retirement plans, make better choices when picking a mortgage, save on their utility bills, and improve the environment simultaneously. Good choice architecture can even improve the process of getting a divorce--or (a happier thought) getting married in the first place! You are very adamant about allowing people to have choice, even though they may make bad ones. But if we know what's best for people, why just nudge? Why not push and shove?

Thaler and Sunstein: Those who are in position to shape our decisions can overreach or make mistakes, and freedom of choice is a safeguard to that. One of our goals in writing this book is to show that it is possible to help people make better choices and retain or even expand freedom. If people have their own ideas about what to eat and drink, and how to invest their money, they should be allowed to do so. You point out that most people spend more time picking out a new TV or audio device than they do choosing their health plan or retirement investment strategy? Why do most people go into what you describe as "auto-pilot mode" even when it comes to making important long-term decisions?

Thaler and Sunstein: There are three factors at work. First, people procrastinate, especially when a decision is hard. And having too many choices can create an information overload. Research shows that in many situations people will just delay making a choice altogether if they can (say by not joining their 401(k) plan), or will just take the easy way out by selecting the default option, or the one that is being suggested by a pushy salesman.

Second, our world has gotten a lot more complicated. Thirty years ago most mortgages were of the 30-year fixed-rate variety making them easy to compare. Now mortgages come in dozens of varieties, and even finance professors can have trouble figuring out which one is best. Since the cost of figuring out which one is best is so hard, an unscrupulous mortgage broker can easily push unsophisticated borrowers into taking a bad deal.

Third, although one might think that high stakes would make people pay more attention, instead it can just make people tense. In such situations some people react by curling into a ball and thinking, well, err, I'll do something else instead, like stare at the television or think about baseball. So, much of our lives is lived on auto-pilot, just because weighing complicated decisions is not so easy, and sometimes not so fun. Nudges can help ensure that even when we're on auto-pilot, or unwilling to make a hard choice, the deck is stacked in our favor. Are we humans just poorly adapted for making sound judgments in an increasingly fast-paced and complex world? What can we do to position ourselves better?

Thaler and Sunstein: The human brain is amazing, but it evolved for specific purposes, such as avoiding predators and finding food. Those purposes do not include choosing good credit card plans, reducing harmful pollution, avoiding fatty foods, and planning for a decade or so from now. Fortunately, a few nudges can help a lot. A few small hints: Sign up for automatic payment plans so you don?t pay late fees. Stop using your credit cards until you can pay them off on time every month. Make sure you're enrolled in a 401(k) plan. A final hint: Read Nudge.

"How often do you read a book that is both important and amusing, both practical and deep? This gem of a book presents the best idea that has come out of behavioral economics. It is a must-read for anyone who wants to see both our minds and our society working better. It will improve your decisions and it will make the world a better place."-Daniel Kahneman, Princeton University, Nobel Laureate in Economics (Daniel Kahneman )

"In this utterly brilliant book, Thaler and Sunstein teach us how to steer people toward better health, sounder investments, and cleaner environments without depriving them of their inalienable right to make a mess of things if they want to. The inventor of behavioral economics and one of the nation''s best legal minds have produced the manifesto for a revolution in practice and policy. Nudge won''t nudge you-it will knock you off your feet."-Daniel Gilbert, professor of psychology, Harvard University, Author of Stumbling on Happiness (Daniel Gilbert )

"This is an engaging, informative, and thoroughly delightful book. Thaler and Sunstein provide important lessons for structuring social policies so that people still have complete choice over their own actions, but are gently nudged to do what is in their own best interests. Well done."-Don Norman, Northwestern University, Author of The Design of Everyday Things and The Design of Future Things (Don Norman )

"This book is terrific. It will change the way you think, not only about the world around you and some of its bigger problems, but also about yourself."-Michael Lewis, author of The Blind Side: Evolution of a Game and Liar''s Poker (Michael Lewis )

"Two University of Chicago professors sketch a new approach to public policy that takes into account the odd realities of human behavior, like the deep and unthinking tendency to conform. Even in areas-like energy consumption-where conformity is irrelevant. Thaler has documented the ways people act illogically."-Barbara Kiviat, Time (Barbara Kiviat Time )

"Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein''s Nudge is a wonderful book: more fun than any important book has a right to be-and yet it is truly both."-Roger Lowenstein, author of When Genius Failed (Roger Lowenstein )

"A manifesto for using the recent behavioral research to help people, as well as government agencies, companies and charities, make better decisions."-David Leonhardt, The New York Times Magazine (David Leonhardt The New York Times Magazine )

"I love this book. It is one of the few books I''ve read recently that fundamentally changes the way I think about the world. Just as surprising, it is fun to read, drawing on examples as far afield as urinals, 401(k) plans, organ donations, and marriage. Academics aren''t supposed to be able to write this well."-Steven Levitt, Alvin Baum Professor of Economics, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business and co-author of Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything (Steven Levitt )

Nudge is about choices?how we make them and how we can make better ones. Authors Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein offer a new perspective on preventing the countless mistakes we make? including ill-advised personal investments, consumption of unhealthy foods, neglect of our natural resources, and other bad decisions. Citing decades of cutting-edge behavioral science research, they demonstrate that sensible ?choice architecture?can successfully nudge people towards the best decisions without restricting their freedom of choice. S straightforward, informative, and entertaining, this is a must-read for anyone with interest in our individual and collective well-being.

Customer Reviews:

  • Excellent even for normal people
    I'm not an economist and I rarely read non-fiction, but this is an excellent book. The authors' insights seem just like common sense -- except no one really thought of it before. Treat yourself to a good and educational read....more info
  • Playing fair?
    I have to open with a BIG disclaimer: I have read only the beginning of the introduction available online. That said, I see that the authors have begun by not playing fairly with the reader. In the very first example, the two tables that are "equal" are not. Look at the right-hand table; the two side edges diverge. This is a perspective cue. If the perspective is true, then the right-hand table is far more foreshortened than the left-hand table. That the two are "equal" in area in the plane of the paper is the trick; if these were actual three-dimensional objects, they would not be equal at all.

    I mistrust authors who play tricks to make a point, and who don't later make those tricks right. Your mileage may vary....more info
  • A Triumph for Behavioral Economics
    Richard Thaler, an economist at the University of Chicago School of Business, is one of the founders of modern behavioral economics, along with economists Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman. Cass Sunstein is a legal scholar and political science professor at the University of Chicago, and has been at the forefront of applying the results of experimental economics to social problems, especially in the field of law.

    This book has one Big Idea, and it is a very important one. The idea is called "status quo bias," meaning that in many choice situations, people value the status quo (what they currently have), and will forgo the opportunity to switch to an alternative unless the alternative is significantly more attractive than the status quo. In situations where it is difficult to evaluate the exact benefits and costs of what one has over what one could only obtain with some conscious effort, people will tend to stick with what they have.

    For example, in the United States, the default condition with respect to organ donation is "no donation," so if people want to donate their organs upon death, they must explicitly state this preference. In France, the default condition is "donation," and an individual who does not like this default condition must expressly indicate a desire not to donate. Consequently, the rate of organ donation is France is several times higher than it is in the United states.

    The idea behind Nudge is that the choice of a default condition can both allow individuals to choose as they please in a democratic, market society, while at the same time improving social outcomes by providing default conditions that lead to socially useful choices. Thaler and Sunstein call this "libertarian paternalism." While one might think that this minimal sort of market intervention can have only a limited impact on social outcomes, the organ donation example suggests otherwise. Perhaps the most important policy of this type would be a mandate that employers make contributions to retirement savings, in the form of 401(k) and other plans be the default, so that individuals who do not wish to save would have to register the desire to opt out of the plans. A related ideas developed in the book is that employees commit to saving a certain fraction of future raises they are awarded by employers, the idea being that it people do not want to reduce their "status quo" income in order to save, but they may be willing to accept a lower new "status quo" when the status quo changes. This is a very sensible idea.

    A second sort of libertarian paternalism takes the form of having the government require firms reveal with clarity and salience the full terms of contractual agreement with consumers. For instance, the nutritional content of restaurant food might be required on the menu, or the precise interest rate on a mortgage might be required to be posted, or all the charges of a broker might be required to be itemized on a monthly statement. These measures are "paternalistic," because if consumers were fully aware of the situation, they might demand this information from firms, and market competition would then lead to compliance. The role of the government in this situation would then be the more traditional one of enforcing "truth in advertizing"---firms are not allowed to misrepresent their offerings.

    Libertarian paternalism, of course, is not a panacea, and will not replace the price system as the central mechanism for allocating goods and services, and will not obviate the need for legislation that corrects market failures, such as the tendency for excessive energy use to undermine the natural environment, and perhaps even partially offsets such "human frailties" as the tendency towards undersaving and abusing illegal substances. However, libertarian paternalism is attractive as a first line of attack on even these problems, and should be part of the policy-maker's toolkit.

    ...more info
  • Why Every Doctor Should Change Their Last Name to Aardvark
    This is one of those rare books that can actually make you change the way you look at things. Specifically, Thaler and Sunstein discuss what they refer to as choice architecture or the conscious ways in which choices can be presented to people in various situations, particularly in areas where people can be helped (nudged) in making better decisions. They rely heavily on the existing psychological knowledge base related to decision making, but they take this knowledge and reconfigure it in a way that can make for powerfully beneficial choice architecture.

    Thaler and Sunstein provide ample examples and areas of public policy where their choice architecture process can be applied - health insurance, savings, and investments, for example - areas where, generally speaking, choices are plentiful, complex and feedback (results) take a long time to be seen. They give good examples of where good choice architecture has met the desired goals, or at least helped move people in the right direction. They also describe the human tendencies that choice architecture overcomes or counteracts- the status quo bias - for example.

    The one area where I think their proposal for choice architecure is naive is in same sex marriages. Creating a dichotomy between the two by having civil authorities approve civil unions (for anyone) and only private institutions, religious ones primarily, conducting marriages, as they see fit, does not address the larger cultural and religious issues which are super-charged with emotion. This is not the same as trying to nudge someone to save more or to reduce their smoking.

    Anyone who influences others, particularly government policy makers, needs to read this book to determine whether how they structure choices is helping or impeding their goals, and if the latter, adjust according to Thaler's and Sunstein's suggestions.

    Oh, and this is why every doctor should change their last name to Aardvark. When I pick a doctor, after I find the specialty (usually a mental health practitioner), I start looking at the directory alphabetically, and I usually pick my doctor from the first few letters of the alphabet. So, if you are a doctor and want to apply better choice architecture, change your name to Aardvark....more info
  • Not what I was expecting
    Perhaps I should have looked more into what I was getting. I was expecting a book which helped the individual make good decisions as well as influence others to make the good decisions they want to make but sometimes don't. There were some really good concepts in this book which covered these areas, but primarily it was a book for the politically minded. It goes very into detail on finances as well as medicare and various government programs which could be improved. While I love the idea of "Libertarian Paternalism", be aware this book is very political (the concepts can easily be applied to any party though) and contains little advice for the individual who is looking to better themselves. As another reviewer stated:

    "It is a book that people interested in any aspect of public policy should read. It is a book that people interested in politics should read."...more info
  • engaging and thought-provoking
    Everyone seems to be talking about this book, and the Tories like it a lot (which may not necessarily be a good sign). The book shows how people often behave in irrational ways and offers some gentle 'nudging' techniques for making them behave more responsibly and sensibly. There are some very entertaining illustrations and examples - I love the story about the urinals at the airport (but I won't go into any more detail here or else I'll spoil it for you.) Sometimes, however, the strategies seem to be a little less subtle than the authors suggest - for example, the idea that there should be a waiting period before people get married. Surely that's a little too much interference? Nevertheless, the book is an excellent and stimulating - and optimistic - read. I recommend it along with Stop the Age Clock: Look 20 Years Younger, 20 Pounds Lighter and 200% Prettier in Only 20 Days...more info
  • Disappointing and political
    As an economist, Nudge was a book that I desperately wanted to like. Unfortunately, I was disappointed. Perhaps my low rating of the book stems from my high expectations of a book co-authored by the well-regarded behavioral economist Richard Thaler. Without such expectations, my rating might have been higher. But at the same time, without such expectations, I might not have bothered to read the book at all.

    The only interesting part of the book is the first part, which consists of the first five chapters. Here, the authors lay out the main premise of the book. The decisions humans make are affected by "nudges." Since nudges are not easy to define, they are best explained through examples. The clearest example of a nudge is a default. When you register online at a site, you are often asked, "Would you like to receive future emails?" By default this box could be either checked or not checked. The default matters; that is, different results emerge under different defaults. The main point of the book is that nudges matter and thus should be carefully designed.

    The rest of the book presents a laundry list of policies to which we should apply this principle. For me, this got boring fast. For some reason, the authors seem to be obsessed with identifying every possible nudge and offering their nudge design suggestions. The end of the paperback version of the book became really ridiculous - a bonus chapter of twenty more nudges. I think that the hardcover version is saved from this madness, because the bonus chapter was added after the publication of the hardcover version.

    Many may find Nudge overly political. The authors weigh in on what they believe to be good nudges on a large number of hot political issues such as Medicare and same-sex marriage. I personally didn't mind their political stances as much as I minded the lack of economics.

    The book is also poorly written. I felt that the publishers gave the authors complete free reign since the authors were well-regarded academics, and obviously academics don't need editors. One problem with the writing was the lack of a targeted audience. The book is supposed to be targeted towards a mass audience; or at least, that is the target of the book's marketing efforts. It is not a textbook or standard teaching material targeted towards undergraduate economics majors. It is also not a serious academic discourse targeted towards other economists. And yet, although it's supposed to be targeted towards the layman, the writing is oftentimes confused about its audience. Additionally, I didn't care for the writing style. While I do enjoy a casual and conversational tone, this book suffered from unnecessary tangential remarks that detracted from the main point. All of the writing issues in this book could have been easily rectified with a good editor. I don't fault the authors as much as I do the publishers for that oversight.

    I weakly recommend Part I of Nudge to the intellectually curious layman. The rest of the book I recommend only to those want to read a laundry list of political suggestions....more info
  • No New Ideas, Even Wonks get bored...
    Book started well, but when these guys try to resolve issues they claim to be important, ah, nothing happens......more info
  • Economics Breaks Free from 18th Century Psychology
    Milton Friedman famously wrote that economic models should be judged by their ability to predict and explain, not the realism of their assumptions. Neoclassical microeconomics has long used that argument to defend itself from criticisms of its unrealistic assumptions. But Thaler, Sunstein and many others are amassing a large body of evidence that shows, in many important cases, that neoclassical microeconomics does not predict very well. In so doing, they are liberating economics from the straitjacket of outdated psychology.

    In addition to economists, policy wonks should read the book for its clever, "libertarian paternalism" approach to policy that transcends the tired left-right dichotomy. Thaler and Sunstein present many VERY low-cost ideas that could result in major improvements in people's lives.

    Heterodox economists of the old-institutionalist variety should also read the book, as it provides evidence for things like the power of emulation and inertia....more info
  • Choice Architect - great concept but downhill from there
    I like the way the book started especially the concept of design as never neutral and being choice architects but the book is quite a bore. Not a pleasure to read past 1/3 of the book.

    A lot of its other concepts are also in other books. It would have been better if examples were organized in better format. There were parts of the book that read like a university textbook.

    Read, Skim or Pass: SKIM...more info
  • Are we human or are we econs?
    This book breaks down to three sections:

    The first section explains the core thesis of 'Nudge' or Choice Architecture. This is, by far, the most interesting portion of the book. It explains why people do what they do, and why many major decisions (picking mortgages, for example) are so misguided. The information (economic or behavior related) isn't necessarily new, but this combination & analysis of the pieces is compelling. This section of the book is interesting enough on its own to make the whole book recommendable.

    The second section is an in depth discussion of a number of issues, that tends to become slightly wonkish. The breakdowns are necessary to understand the problem, and then see how the 'Nudge' solution (or 'Choice Architecture') would work. Like anything wonkish, your interest level may vary based on what's being discussed. This section of the book isn't bad, but it can be a let down after such a strong start to the book.

    The last section contains conclusions, a summary and if you have the paperback, a short commentary on how the book's apply to the economic/political events of 2008. Everything here is solid and mostly ties up the loose ends, offering final arguments, etc.

    I like public policy, economics and any fresh solution to old problems, so I liked this book a lot. I also found various similarities in Choice Architecture to my work, in software development. The book gently alludes to software design, and how its choice architecture (typically defining the 'default' selection, etc) is better than what you find when picking a mortgage/insurance/anything in the real world. The authors also recommend things like all quotes/offers/etc for insurance or mortgages arrive in a standard digital format, so they can easily be compared with everything else out there....something that is very natural in all software design. In many ways, the solutions offered in the book borrow a great deal from software design....more info
  • The nub of Nudge
    Paternalism of any kind is dangerous, except for children. There are no "Econs" among the human race, so the "planners" themselves are only us, and not "rational" either, and have their own motivations, benign or malign. Any assumption planners, whether political ones or commercial ones, are always benign is naive. So, we cannot move the decision making to the "planners" and conclude they will inevitably make the best choices for us to be nudged towards.

    All we can hope for in fact is that books like Nudge show us how it all works. Then we can at least know what's going on, especially what the "planners" are unwittingly, or more importantly wittingly, trying to get us to "choose", and we can have a say in their activities....more info
  • Something new under the sun...
    Thaler and Sunstein pulled off something fairly rare and valuable in this book; they offered up a social/political idea that isn't currently being offered up by either the Republicans or the Democrats, but is still politically viable for either party. That's a good thing, because it can be easy to forget that the Democrats and Republicans aren't the only sources of political, social and economic ideas out there.

    The authors label themselves as Libertarian Paternalists, two terms that would not normally go together. Libertarians tend to want very small government with a high degree of freedom for citizens, while paternalists tend to think the government should show citizens the right way to do things even at the expense of their freedoms.

    Thaler and Sunstein marry the two ideas, saying that governments should not limit peoples' options, but should offer guidance in certain decision-making scenarios. Those decisions would be the ones that are complex for lay-people to make (like prescription drug plan options) or have many options (like choosing a manager for your retirement investments). While the authors do not want to reduce the number of options available or make the decision for anyone (libertarian), they do want to provide well-researched default options and/or forms of encouragement they call nudges to get people headed in a sensible direction (paternalism).

    They give a small-stakes example of arranging the food choices in a school cafeteria so that the healthiest options are positioned at eye level at the beginning of the line so they are chosen more frequently (this apparently does really work). They don't want to take away the less healthy options, but neither do they heed the call to stay completely uninvolved. It's a hard philosophy to fault from either side of the political aisle and seems promising for implementation on a number of troubling political fronts we face right now.

    Highly recommended for people who like new ideas and are curious to hear about something that isn't being talked up by either of our two major political parties right now. ...more info
  • a book written by Libertarians nudging the reader to be a libertarian
    To be fair, I think only first five chapters are worth reading. After's really a long yawn unless you are sympathetic to Libertarian ideas. There is nothing new in this book. I'm little tired of picking up books with rehashed examples already mentioned in other books like "Blink", "Freakonomics" or "Influence"....more info
  • Excellent intro how to manage group decision making
    This is an excellent user friendly introduction to behavioral economics and the art of decision making in a group context. Richard Thaler is a renowned economist and is a leader in this discipline. He is the main author of this book as he has contributed all the concepts and underlying research.

    Behavioral economics deals with all the actions human take within the investment field and others that defy traditional economics. Within "Nudge" Thaler comes up with many examples of such irrational behaviors. Those are also well covered by Dan Ariely in Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions and Scott Plous in The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Those behavioral anomalies, include: anchoring, availability, representativeness, framing, loss aversion, and overconfidence among many others.

    Thaler describe our cognitive systems duality. One is the Automatic System that is lightning quick, intuitive, instinctive. It includes the immediate "fight or flight" mechanism. It does not leverage much cognitive resources. Thus, it errs the minute a situation calls for critical thinking. That's when the second cognitive system comes in: the Reflective System. But, as Keith Stanovich states in "What Intelligence Tests Miss" we are all cognitive resource misers. We make mistakes because we rely too often on the Automatic System.

    The authors invent a new language to describe the influencing of choice (nudging). They call this activity Choice Architecture (presenting options in a certain manner so as to influence others selection). And, the person doing it is a Choice Architect. Thaler states we are all at times Choice Architects whether we are lawyers, doctors, managers, parents, or spouses. We present facts and options,so as to influence the choice of others. As an example of framing, your doctor will sell you an expensive treatment as having a 90% success rate rather than a 10% failure rate. A computer would not differentiate between the two identical probabilities. But, a human will be very sensitive to this framing.

    Choice architecture often is based on the default option being the optimal choice selection. Such default options can cause people to be organ donors in case of death when they would not otherwise. Thaler goes into much detail regarding 401K choice architecture. And, I found it really relevant. I wish many benefit managers would read that specific chapter.

    Choice architecture can become complex. Amazon and NetFlix are masters of choice architecture as their entire websites are geared to facilitate you making desirable choices and continue transacting with them.

    Thaler goes on reviewing many different existing choice architectures in the marketplace and find them really wanting. Cell phone plans, mortgages, credit cards, and all other financial products have pretty terrible choice architecture. The customer has no idea what he ultimately will be charged. Thaler suggests all such services should be required to have transparent pricing readily captured in a simple table so the customer understand what he pays. That's a wonderful suggestion, but Thaler may be missing the point that the lack of pricing transparency is intentional to hide the true price to the customer.

    Next, Thaler moves on to the government sector. There he reviews the choice architecture of the U.S. Medicare Part D plan and Sweden's privatized social security investment choices. In both cases, the choice architecture is really poor. That is simply because the policymakers (choice architects) fell for the counterproductive mantra of maximizing the number of choices (many different drug insurance option for Part D; many investment fund options for the Swedish system). This seemed like a laudable goal; But, the result was chaos, frustration, and confusion on the part of the relevant constituency. Barry Schwartz in his excellent The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less expands on this theme by stating that the more choice we have the more confused we get and the worst selection we ultimately make. Good choice architecture suggests nudging people towards a single and optimal default option and offering a limited amount of alternatives. Medicare Part D does not even have a default option. Instead, it assigns beneficiaries to various plans randomly with as expected really bad results.

    In one of the last chapters, the authors review 12 potential nudges. I found a couple of them really attractive. One of them consists in the IRS automatically generating your tax return if you have a straightforward situation. Studies indicate this process would save 225 million hours! Another interesting nudge is to give the right to motorcyclists not to wear a helmet if they have:
    a) completed additional driving training;
    b) submitted proof of insurance; and
    c) signed an organ donor form.

    The authors even invent a political philosophy to reflect their behavioral framework: Libertarian Paternalism. They pleasure in the fact that the phrase is an oxymoron. It stands for little government intervention, much freedom, and enlightened nudges so people make better decision for their health, safety, and welfare of society. They claim this represents the optimal third way to breakdown the logjam in today's polarized politics. Democrats want social mandates to protect the needy. Republicans want "laissez faire" capitalism to maximize choices and opportunity for the competent. The authors instead recommend "nudges" for the needy that still protect choices for the competent.

    ...more info
  • $15.44 Kindle pricing?
    A book as progressively forward thinking as this appears to be, ought to be priced in line with the Kindle standard pricing "theory". Perhaps the $15.44 marker is merely one giant "paternalistic libertarian" choice-architecture experiment? I wonder. . . ....more info
  • A hollow and anti-democratic worldview
    My dictionary tells me that "nudge," which rhymes with "judge" and means a gentle push, is probably of Norwegian origin. The authors are careful to distinguish this from the Yiddishism "noodge," meaning pest or bore (@4). So maybe a bakkel, which is what they call doughnuts in Norway, would be a more appropriate analogy for this book than a bagel. But either way, the book is missing something at its core. And it is not as much of a departure from the Chicago School worldview as some reviews would have you believe.

    1. Richard Thaler (RT) and Cass Sunstein (CS) base their recommendations on the experimental studies of A. Tversky, D. Kahneman and, among others, RT himself. As developed during the past three decades or so, these have led to the field of "behavioral economics" (and a Nobel Prize for Kahneman). The gist is that people have certain "irrational" ways of looking at the world that lead them to act differently from the way most economists assume for their convenience of their theories. By "nudge" they mean a design element in a thing or in a process that anticipates these psychological tendencies, and steers people toward behavior that, ideally, helps them without limiting their freedom.

    Many of the principles and techniques they describe (which other reviewers on this page summarize) have been known and exploited for far longer than there were fancy names for them. Retailers have set at prices $9.98 rather than $10.00 since time immemorial, relying on "availability". The wisdom of writing contracts and designing business processes with "idiot-proof" procedures (the term I was taught decades ago, in lieu of "nudge") is similarly ancient, at least within better law firms and companies. So RTCS's notion that nudges could be used more often when designing social policy shouldn't be very controversial. And on their face, many of their analyses make sense.

    2. RTCS do skate on thin ice near the end, when they make it explicit that they're relying on "the invisible hand" of markets to make their proposals work (e.g., @239-240) - a hand whose existence, or at least invisibility, is controversial. They're also on shaky ground when they suggest that John Rawls's "publicity principle" should be a constraint on nudges "in both the public and private sectors" (@244-245). This principle states that governments shouldn't select policies that they wouldn't be willing or able to defend publicly to their own citizens. RTCS don't spell out, though, the scope of this principle in the private sector. Should the analogue of "citizen" be shareholder, or indeed all citizens? If the latter, what's the source of this duty? If to shareholders only, where does that leave the rest of us?

    3. But those are details. The deeper problem is what's missing from the big picture of this book. Namely: society.

    "There is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families." So said Margaret Thatcher, and though RTCS don't quote her, they seem to share this view. Everything in this book is focused on decisions made by individuals (called "Humans" by RTCS) for their own good or ill, and based on their own preferences. The only other entity is a "Planner", such as a legislature, bureaucracy, judiciary or corporate management. Its relationship to individuals is top-down. Moreover, the Planner's own psychological quirks are rarely discussed. In effect, the "homo economicus"-type of rationality that behavioral economics denies to Humans is shifted up one level to the Planner.

    The idea that people might act together to influence the Planner, select the Planner, communicate their will to the Planner, or rebel against the Planner is totally missing from this book (aside from a passing reference in a footnote (@238). This is very much in line with Robert Reich's observation in "Supercapitalism" (2007) that collective action and debate in American democracy has been replaced by an atomistic consumerism affecting all aspects of life, including politics.

    The worldview expressed in "Nudge" is a far cry from the idea of "active liberty" described by Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in his book of that name (2005). Democratic participation in lawmaking is central to Breyer's view, and policy decisions should be based on facilitating that participation. OTOH, in their footnote, RTCS make the conjunction of good laws and popular will sound like an occasional happy accident: "Social practices, and the laws that reflect them, often persist not because they are wise but because Humans, often suffering from self-control problems, are simply following other Humans. ... We do not mean here to question the view that laws that really do embody the judgments of many people often deserve support for that reason" (@238n). Of course one can think of examples where what RTCS say here is right; slavery, for example. But many other cases are less clear-cut (not that RTCS even express any opinion on the slavery issue or the "wisdom" of any other human rights). This footnote embodies the entire discussion of democracy you'll find in this book. RTCS don't even specify who those "many people" might be -- "Planners" perhaps?

    4. A corollary of RTCS's ignoring society is that they have no sensitivity to culture (notwithstanding numerous references to TV shows). This is most obvious in their chapters on organ donations (Ch. 11) and marriage (Ch. 15). The idea of a market for the purchase and sale of human organs "has obvious merit, [but] it is also spectacularly unpopular for reasons that are not well understood" (@175). Maybe the reason is that peoples' cultural beliefs lead them to find the idea of such a market repugnant?

    Or how about RTCS's proposal that the institution of marriage be left to private religious groups, with government providing only the institution of civil union - for everyone. They don't consider the idea that a nation's laws should express the cultural values of its people. Nor do they consider whether civil unions would be accepted without stigma in society - or even within families. Since many inter-faith marriages wouldn't be recognized under the laws of any specific religion, do RTCS expect people to shop around for a more convenient religion, or give up religion altogether? Maybe someday people will come around to RTCS's ultra-rational view (which may also be tinted by the apparently divorced status of at least one of them), but we're a long way from it. They need to deal with that.

    One more thing about culture: RTCS assert that Tversy & Kahneman-type psychological tendencies arise from brain function (@19), and throughout the book they use the word "Human" to describe people who display those tendencies. I'm not an expert in this area of research, but it isn't clear how much of it has relied on subjects from non-Western cultures. Previous multi-cultural studies in behavioral economics, such as "Foundations of Human Sociality" edited by J. Heinrich & al. (2004), show considerable variation across cultures. So the details of "choice architecture" may be far more culturally-specific, and less scientifically grounded, than RTCS acknowledge. Certainly the book's point of departure, how to engineer behavior on the basis of individual preferences to behaviors, is very American. It would be quite alien to many books on social policy from France, Germany or Japan, for example. BTW playing this scientistic rhetorical trump card in matters of policy is a hallmark of the Chicago School. See, e.g., James Hackney Jr.'s "Under Cover of Science" (2007), which, despite not being enitrely convincing about the historical reasons for this rhetorical trope, is entirely correct in identifying it.

    5. CS was close with the Clinton Administration, and an early supporter of Obama. He's probably on the short list for a Federal judgeship - even to fill a Supreme Court vacancy - next time the Democrats take the White House. Before reading this book, I'd have welcomed such an appointment. Now, I'd be much more cautious to do so. America is a society in addition to being a group of individuals. And that society is the source of any "Planner's" authority. I hesitate to give such authority to anyone who forgets where it comes from, and forgets the values that underlie it. Unfortunately, that is exactly what the authors of "Nudge" appear to have forgotten. ...more info
  • Liberal Dogma Posing as Erudition
    The authors don't think you're very smart, which is undoubtedly why they published this thinly veiled dogma posing as erudite economics for the general public.

    A good read if you want to begin understand how the current administration will take advantage of what they believe is your ignorance, and a good replacement for caffeine if having your intelligence insulted gets your blood going in the morning....more info
  • Insightful, surprising, rich... an intellectual "nudge!"
    A well-written, insightful, and intellectually-engaging work that gives a real "nudge" to one's thinking and way of looking at the world....more info
  • Dangerous elitist rubbish
    The fashionable ideas of behaviourial economists like this are elitist rubbish. Who decides what "positive social norms" people need to be nudged toward? Those same would-be decision makers are just as fallible, lazy, stupid, greedy, weak, loss-averse, stubborn, and prone to inertia and conformism (and poor decision-makers) as the people to be nudged.
    ...more info
  • Puts together behavior and economic
    While this is not totally satisfying to my economist husband, I like that it draws on psychological research, to look at things in a new way. People talk about inter-disciplinary work, but it seems to be relatively rare. ...more info
  • Useful analysis of factors affecting decision making
    In this lovely, useful book, Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein examine choices, biases and the limits of human reasoning from a variety of perspectives. They often amuse by disclosing how they have fallen victim to the limitations of thought that they are describing. The fact that these educated, articulate professionals can fool themselves so often demonstrates how tough it is to think clearly, a point the authors emphasize and even repeat. Humans fall prey to systematic errors of judgment, but you can harness this problematic tendency productively, including by helping others make better decisions. Some of the authors' suggestions may not be practical, but many are and all are interesting. getAbstract recommends this book to anyone who wants to know how to shape responsible decisions. ...more info
  • Reads too much like Behavioral Psychology textbook
    This book is about influencing people to take actions towards a desireable objective. If you have ever taken a Behavioral Psychology class in college, the topic, structure, and even the research studies contained in this book will look familiar.

    The two authors are University of Chicago professors. Indeed, their familiarity with the subject matter and their deep analysis of human beahvior and how they are influenced by the environment are very impressive.

    The book is full of empirical studies on Psychology. It is very long on research reference and analysis, but somewhat short on suggestions. Although it contains a lot of good information, I can't say it is an entertaining read....more info
  • Please enter a title for your review
    so yeah i did what they said on pg 17-18 and measured the dimensions of the tabletop diagrams. the two tabletops on pg 17 measure 5.25mm by 2.5mm and 5.5mm by 2.2mm respectively. A smaller difference that the naked eye suggests, but a difference nonetheless. Then on pg 18 we're presented with a different diagram of two identical tabletops, 2.4mm by 5.4mm (or thereabouts, the sides aren't all even in any of the diagrams) and told these tabletops have the same dimensions as those on pg 17, thus proving they were identical all along. wtf?...more info
  • A must read
    Behavioural economics has rapidly become popularised and a couple of titles have made the best seller list, but if you read only one or two this should be on your list. What makes this different is that the authors come up with policy options which could significantly improve public policy choices and save our taxes....more info
  • Enjoyable
    I liked the book. It was interesting and well written...not extremely addicting, but enjoyable....more info
  • Misleading and manipulative fig.1.1; the book also?
    The authors work readers by asking us to estimate the width to length ratios of two tables shown counterposed in their figure 1.1. (This is a variation of a perception puzzle common to pop psychology books.) As expected, they declare the reader wrong if one table is thought to appear longer than the other. One, in fact, does look longer.

    We are then told that the two tables are the same shape/size (chagrin). The authors then pounce: "Not only were you wrong; you were probably confident that you were right." (Boy, did we get you on that one!) All of which is an exercise to demonstrate just how much we really need their expertise and how important their tome is to us. Unfortunately, there is a problem with the way the tables are drawn, one that that punctures their presumed authority.

    In measuring the table legs of the table on the left in figure 1.1, I find that the more-or-less vertical separation of the legs (as measured from the outer edges of the 'buns' at leg end) is 1 13/16". In contrast, the same measurement taken on the legs of the table on the right (more or less horizontal) is 1 9/16". That difference, 4/16" or 1/4", is clearly noticeable and can only mislead. Inadvertently or not, the fact that the authors have made such a big point of the exercise and yet failed to check their facts suggests unreliable material. Fool me once, shame on you; .... I booted Nudge with a disdainful grudge....more info
  • Why I bought this book
    This was a Christmas present for my economist son. He was pleasantly surprised and said he had heard so much about it since he has been an Obama fan for a long time and knew that Barack Obama had read it and recommended it.

    I chose the book for that reason but also it looked like a novel approach to the overworked subject of self-improvement. But I have not read the book yet. Will borrow it after my son reads it and will report back at that time. ...more info
  • Love the Concept of "Choice Architecture"
    The authors' concept of "choice architect" is great. They define a choice architect as having "...the responsibility for organizing the context in which people make decisions."

    They provide a range of choice architectures in action. Everything from offering healthy snacks earlier in school cafeteria traffic flows to encouraging 401K deposits at a future date rather than immediately, to helping seniors understand Medicare Part D.

    In business, whether we know it or not, we are acting as a "choice architects" every time we plan a presentation. Simply by deciding what to leave in and what to leave out, we are designing the context for making decisions.

    Thaler and Sunstein offer a range of ways to provide structure to the choices you offer to your business associates, customers, and contributors to your favorite charities
    ...more info
  • BEHAVIORAL behavioral economics

    Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Hardcover)
    by Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein (2008)

    # Hardcover: 293 pages
    # Publisher: Yale University Press (April 8, 2008)
    # Language: English
    # ISBN-10: 0300122233
    # ISBN-13: 978-0300122237


    BEHAVIORAL behavioral economics
    By Paul Brandon

    A note: this is not a general review of the book, but rather an analysis of the ways in which the system presented in the book is congruent with that of another system: behavior analysis. Were it a general review I would take issue with many of the suggestions made by the authors.

    `Nudge' appears to be mainstream behavioral economics; economists attempting to make their analysis more realistic by replacing the completely rational `Economic Man' of classical economic analysis with a more realistic version derived from the decision theoretical work of Tversky and Kahneman. Nothing theoretically radical here. In fact, its roots can be traced back to John B. Watson (yes, that Watson), the founder of advertising psychology.

    The authors' point is that classical economics is in fact a poor guide to action if we want to be effect in changing what people do. Instead they propose some empirically supported strategies for behavior change which they derive from some recent work in the area of decision theory, although (as I will point out) many of the strategies they propose can be more parsimoniously derived from other conceptual systems.

    In fact, this is a good example of parallel evolution.
    Thaler and Sunstein are responding to the same environmental situations as behaviorists do, and it is not surprising that the common set of contingencies (observed patterns of human behavior) occasion similar verbal behavior. What has surprised me as I read the book is that my typical response is not `how dumb', but `of course.' They suggest generally the same courses of action that I would as a behaviorist; I (and more so behavioral behavioral economists) might suggest some detail differences, but by and large what they suggest makes good behavioral sense.
    Of course, I differ with some of their recommendations, and would argue that they have cherry-picked the data that these recommendations in areas like education are based on.

    As I've indicated, there is another field of behavioral economics.
    This is a group of behavior analysts (Skinnerian or Radical Behaviorism) who have incorporated some of the concepts of economics such as value delay discounting and demand elasticity into the terms of behavior analysis, and can be looked at as an application of proven behavioral principles. Specifically, they avoid coercion by emphasizing existing stimulus control rather than programmed reinforcement or punishment. Thaler and Sunstein's distinction between Automatic and Reflective Systems maps easily onto the behavioral distinction between contingency and rule governed behavior: behavior governed by direct contact with outcomes versus behavior controlled by learned verbal rules.

    A 'nudge' itself sounds very much like what a behaviorist would call a prompt -- the minimal stimulus necessary to produce a behavior that is already likely to occur. Much of their discussion seems to concern how to prompt behavior rather than compelling it with obvious rewards and punishments -- good behavioral practice.

    One might say that it is a plea to identify and use existing stimulus control (the way we learn to behavior in a given way in a given situation) as well as some descriptions of common patterns of this sort of influence on our behavior. For example, their RECAP procedure (a simple and readable breakdown of costs) makes the costs and benefits of things like mortgages and credit cards more discriminable.

    Much of their analysis can be put into a structure of concurrent chains.
    They identify two (occasionally more) alternative behavioral sequences involved in some choice situations (such as whether or not to pollute), and then discuss ways in which the contingencies of the competing chains might be altered. This could be as simple as changing the controlling stimuli to make the desired behavior more likely, or if necessary to decrease its response cost, or as a last resort, to more directly modify the consequences in terms of reinforcing or punishing outcomes.
    The fact that a chain is always involved; people always have a choice in the sense of available alternative behaviors, allows them to maintain their `paternalistic libertarian' stance. Thus, they support the use of cap-and-trade systems as an approach to pollution control since it would embed some positive reinforcement contingencies which would result in a decrease in the choice of polluting industrial practices, rather than simply mandating a target (they use the phrase "command-and-control") for pollution reduction.
    This sort of distinction is sometimes more apparent than real; a choice between two possible behaviors is present in both cap-and-trade and direct regulation.
    In the one case, the choice is between paying a tax for polluting on the one hand, and not polluting on the other.
    In the case of direct regulation, the choice is between polluting and suffering some penalty for violating the regulation, versus not polluting.
    Thus, the difference between the two situations is the nature of the contingencies, not the presence or absence of choice.

    As a related point, they talk about the problems involved with too many choices (Barry Schwartz has written on this, although they don't cite him). Medicare D plans are a good example: it's almost impossible to make a good choice given the number and complexity of alternatives.

    In general, the book's analysis is very consistent with the predictions and recommendations that a behavior analyst would make, to the point where I wonder if the ghost of Israel Goldiamond is still roaming the halls of the University of Chicago where the authors work.
    For example, they've discovered the old behavioral tactic of having a person surrender control of a sum of money to someone else. If some goal is met the money is returned; if not it goes to someplace aversive to the client.

    One of the strengths of the book's approach to human behavior is the acknowledgment that we make choices for a reason -- and that these reasons can often be identified. There is no such thing as purely autonomous choice independent of outside influences. Therefore, our choice is not between influence and lack of influence, but whether we will study and use these influences to better our lives. Ignorance is not bliss, nor is it healthy.
    Thaler and Sunstein sugar coat this by using the label `libertarian paternalism', but underlying their argument is the assumption that behavior is not ultimately autonomous, and that the job of `choice architects' (those who manage behavior in any sense) is to identify the aspects of the environment that control actions of interest, and to change behavior by changing the relevant aspects of the environment.

    The book follows a basic pattern:
    The authors first describe how a rational and knowledgeable Economic Person (an Econ) would approach some decision situation, then document how real people (Humans) actually behave, and finally describe some way of restructuring the situation (a Nudge) that would cause Humans to behave in a way more to their long term benefit.

    Some examples of the behavioral processes involved:

    Contingency traps
    One behavioral concept that they appear to be developing is that of the contingency trap.
    This is the observation that immediate consequences (reinforcers) are more effective than delayed ones. Many human problems are due to the fact that a given action usually has more than one consequence. If the immediate consequence is reinforcing, but the long term outcome is harmful, we have a contingency trap. Health risks like overeating and smoking fit into this category. Again, the problem is how to rearrange the environment (particularly the social environment) to provide prompts for behaviors with delayed positive outcomes rather than immediate ones.

    Rule governed behavior
    On of the ways out of a contingency trap is to bring behavior under the control of verbal rules.
    Often this works by making contingencies more obvious.
    In the Nudge context, this is described by terms such as consumer education, getting people to forgo immediate reinforcers that have more delayed and diffuse long-term effects. They apply this to a free market (cap-and-trade) approach to pollution, to overcome the political difficulties involved in getting legislation enacted.

    Social Influence
    Not surprisingly, the authors devote a chapter to this topic; again it's pretty straightforward.
    In behavioral terms (not theirs) social influence can be divided into two categories: modeling (doing what one sees others doing, and getting reinforced for doing) and social reinforcement (direct peer pressure; approval or disapproval of one's actions). An additional process is referred to as `priming': prompting an initial step in the sequence of actions necessary to achieve a goal.
    Despite their `libertarian' stance, they don't seem to find peer pressure unacceptable as a way to change behavior, although their preference is for various forms of prompting.

    Response cost
    T & S have discovered that the cost of doing something affects the likelihood of taking action.
    In particular, people tend to follow the Law of Least Effort (this concept goes back to Thorndike). Among other things, this results in behavioral `inertia' since doing nothing (no change) requires less effort than doing something (such as changing one's asset allocations)
    Thus, in discussing `opt-in' vs `opt-out' methods of having people enroll in programs such as retirement savings, they recommend structuring the programs so that the default action is enrolling in a program, with a positive action required to opt out of it. The same analysis is applied to the task of increasing organ donations.
    Another point: the default payment options on credit cards are a minimum payment that maximizes the company's interest income. Their alternative: make it an equal effort forced choice between minimum payment and complete balance payment.

    A good example of the way in which they apply these principles is the Save More Tomorrow program developed by Thaler and Schlomo Benartzi.
    This program is based on the principle of making a verbal commitment now (a behavior with a low response cost) to do something in the future which has a high response cost. This is very similar to Hayes' ACT (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy).
    In this case, they start with a standard savings plan where people sign up for an automatic periodic transfer of funds to a savings account.
    The added detail is a commitment to a gradual increase in the size of the deduction (some echos of progressive ratio reinforcement schedules here), thus reducing the aversiveness of a large initial payment.
    They also talk about `inertia' as a factor both in maintaining behavior and resisting change; reminiscent of Nevin's Behavioral Momentum Theory, which might provide some additional suggestions for developing this program.


    Some of their predictions seem a bit self contradictory.
    While making a big deal of the difference between "Humans" and "Econs", they seem to assume that simply providing information about costs and benefits of behavior will be enough to change people's choices.
    A good example of this is their analysis of medical malpractice lawsuits. They seem to feel that people might trade off their right to sue in exchange for lower medical fees. This seems to assume that Humans are Econs and make rational choices based on economic considerations.
    An alternative might be the well known psychological principle of minimizing the maximum loss (a mini-max strategy). People will trade off the lowest long-term cost in exchange for minimizing that maximum possible loss. That is why few people will choose to self insure, even if that results in the lowest predicted long term cost.

    Finally, the whole idea of `libertarianism' (paternalistic, maternalistic, or otherwise) seems to contradict the deterministic assumptions of behaviorism.
    From the point of view of the behaviorist, freedom is just another word (see Baum's text for a good analysis of the uses of the term). People do not behave freely in the sense of being autonomous actors, but rather their behavior is determined by the interaction between genetics, experience, and consequences. Our goal is not to maximize freedom (except in the limited sense of absence of aversive control), but rather to promote the use of contingencies which will maximize human welfare.


    My final question is, therefore, do we as Behavior Analysts have a unique contribution to make in the sense of suggesting solutions that are basically and profoundly different from those suggested by non-behaviorists, are do we (at least in the case of social engineering) tend to converge on the same basic solutions?
    In the latter case, our contribution would not be in the uniqueness of our analysis but in the efficiency of its implementation. As I have tried to demonstrate, a non-behavioral analysis based on some nonsystematic decision principles and some canny observations can be more parsimoniously analyzed in behavioral terms. In addition, we might avoid the consequences of pursuing some of the false distinctions implicit in the concept of libertarianism.
    This, in turn, should lead to a more effective implementation.


    Maximizing versus satisficing: Happiness is a matter of choice.
    Schwartz, Barry; Ward, Andrew; Monterosso, John; Lyubomirsky, Sonja; White, Katherine; Lehman, Darrin R.
    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol 83(5), Nov 2002, 1178-1197.
    ...more info
  • Designing Choice Architecture
    This book provides insights to those who need to move people to make good decisions and if they cannot, then the default would do them the least harm. Many of the examples that they have provided are not new, e.g. Singapore has adopted the opt-out model for organ donation years ago. The idea on privatising marriage by the authors is an interesting one. ...more info
  • A great study in human psychology
    I think that anyone in a leadership position should consider reading this book. The book is all about human psychology and how to nudge, or encourage, people to make decisions or enact certain behaviors. The concept of the nudge is that the coercion is subtle rather than forced, which is why I find this beneficial to people in leadership positions.

    Overall, it's a great study in human psychology. The book delves a bit into choice architecture, which seems to scratch a small itch someone might have if they have an interest in usability or user-centered design. The only flaw of the book is that it sometimes finds awkward examples, or that it goes on and on about some topics longer than necessary. The real highlights come in the first half of the book and are mostly just reinforced as the book progresses. Otherwise, it would have been a 5-star book.

    Some of my favorite case examples in the book talk about how lines were painted on a curvy part of Lake Shore Drive in Chicago to "nudge" people to slow down. Signs didn't work, but lines painted on the road whose spacing quickly diminished gave drivers the illusion that they were going fast and as such, they slowed down. The book is full of similarly great examples of how nudges work. In fact, I found so much of them useful that after reading the book, I felt that it was worthwhile to take a few notes and post a synopsis to my site at

    ...more info
  • Mostly Rehash
    With the widely recognized academic reputation of Thaler, I would have expected a far more creative book that covers new territory. I only made it half way through and put it down because it wasn't telling me anything new. This book largely reframes what has been written by several other authors....more info
  • Beware of nudging
    If you have ever been to a theme park or one of those large stores where you can buy things in bulk, you will need this book to understand how they nudged you around so you can spend more money, gain more weight and feel happier.

    This book is simultaneously good and very creepy because it suggests (or implies) that Masses are automatons who have to be guided through life to make better decisions. Isn't that what Hitler tried to do, for the "Volk"? I think that's the same and it also shows that it can blow up (pun intended) in faces of millions of people. It did give us one good thing though: the Beetle (Hitler's pet project to nudge people towards motorization) and Porsche (Hitler's chief engineer for racy sports cars and tanks).

    Choice architecture sounds good when I am shopping for ketchup but it doesn't sound so good in other areas of life.

    Important book in times of crisis. Beware of nudging....more info
  • Interesting Book
    I found this book to provide an interesting perspective into human behavior. The authors make a good case for Libertarian Paternalism. The book is well written and accessible to a wide audience....more info
  • Surpassed My Expectations
    When I invest in a book, I expect to get one rock solid idea that I can apply to improve some aspect of my life. "Nudge" handed me that one idea, then another, and yet another. Truth be known, I can't begin to place an idea "value" on this book; new thoughts are springing forth each day. Great book....more info
  • Couple of socialists in favor of capital & labor allocation with decisions by the "elite who know best."
    The title of this review says it all. One does not get the bias and philosophy of the authors until about half way through the book. An unworthy read; I am glad I got it on loan from the library....more info
  • What causes the perception that credit cards are necessary financial device
    Introduction: In 2004, there were 1.4 billion credit cards. By 2007, the average American family had an average credit card debt of $12,000 and paid the typical 18 percent per year. Credit card payments are decreasing causes increased losses by banks.

    Citigroup, in 2008, credit card losses eclipsed losses in the 1990s and is expected to rise in 2009. The weak economy has pushed more borrowers over the edge and affecting a wider range of borrower types.

    1. Credit cards provide a convenience allowing to user to be cashless and still have buying power.

    2. Businesses, such as, hotels and restaurants cater to credit card usage.

    3. Credit cards provide a ready source of liquidity

    4. Debit cards often offer a line of credit

    5. Credit card usage is compulsive and addictive and has a huge nudge factor and tension. The constraints to usage don't exist and the temptative tension to use the credit card is compulsive and pressure oriented.

    6. Excessive Credit cards usage and accumulative debt demonstrates lack of self-control

    7. Credit cards provide instant gratification bypassing the discipline of saving for a duration, accumulating, and purchasing with cash.

    8. People don't like to be told not to use their credit cards. They rebel at the censorship of their excessive usage and feel credit card usage is a right.

    9. Credit card companies should be required to a electronic copy to the consumer showing all the precise usage and fee payments, so customers get a better sense of what they are paying for.

    10. Credit card companies establish rules that help them raise fees. One way credit card companies capitalize on fee is by shortening the day you ahve between the time you get your bill and the day your payment is due. One day late means 30 days late, you pay the penalty and the interest; one day can result in a 100 dollar fee.

    11. Credit card debt is unsecure debt. Default rates are expected to increase during receding economies.

    12. Credit cards have hidden fees.

    13. Interest paid on credit cards is not tax deductible.

    14. Credit card companies require the consumer to pay the minimal payment and extend payment for decades without moral remorse.

    15. People are more afraid to abandon their credit cards than to use cash.

    16. Credit card companies should allow the automatic payment of the full bill.
    ...more info
  • good psychology
    Great insights to human behavior and how to incorporate appropriate options for progress on complex issues. Very well written and easy to read. Reveals good sense of humor of authors. Extensive documentation, but not at all off-putting. Highly recommend for students of human behavior....more info
  • The fallacy of free will ...
    An excellent treatment and analysis of human predisposition to making choices - and how one can influence them. This book clearly establishes the fact many of us suspect - that there is no such thing as pure rational decision-making (realistically), free will, and most importantly, independent thinking. Understanding this critical aspect let's us engineer our own decisions and choice presentations in a more persuasive way. Highly recommended!...more info
  • No man's land
    The subtitle of the book ("Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness") is what caught my eye at the bookstore, but dare I say, the authors fail to deliver. The introduction starts with a prolonged justification of what authors call "libertarian paternalism" or "choice architecture" - a process of carefully nudging people into making a specific decision - but the reader is left wondering why the authors are so compelled to defend their own ideas before even explaining them. They've made me a skeptic before they even began.

    Studies from behavioral economics, psychology and sociology fields are introduced in the context of choice architecture, but once again, the authors often veer off into giving public policy prescriptions, or simply citing the study results. It is as if they got stuck in the middle: there are no new and interesting academic insights, nor are the public policy suggestions grounded in what the authors know best.

    If you're interested in the subject, I would recommend "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely instead....more info
  • False advertising
    Thaler and Sunstein's Nudge is best read as a list of examples of and general principles for developing choice architecture in order to improve outcomes. It can provide an understanding of the pros can cons of opt-out, opt-in, forced choices, random selection, and default preferences.

    This book was sold to me as something more than that, and the authors continuously repeat their "libertarian paternalism" catch phrase. Simply put, there's very little that could be called libertarian about this book. School choice is a possible exception, but kids always complicate patterns.

    To quote the video of the authors on the book's amazon page, "this book is not so much about whether we should have big or small government." The primary failing is that while government programs may be improved through choice architecture, there will always be force involved to the extent that government is making decisions. Reducing the size of the government budget is by default a way to increase liberty, and their refusal to acknowledge that makes their "libertarian paternalism" mantra ring hollow.

    The most interesting fact I learned from this book is that the social security website has operating hours....more info


Old Release Old Products